The Impact of Collective Opinion on Online Judgment
نویسنده
چکیده
Social media are part of our everyday lives. These technologies allow people to share their opinions with others. Here I examine whether the opinions posted online actually change people’s perception of the world or they simply serve as anchors when people post their own opinions. Participants rated the interestingness of given stories. In one condition, the stories were presented with invented average ratings of others that matched the rating task. In another condition, the assumed opinions of others mismatched the rating task. Only in the task match condition, people used the opinions of others when rating the stories. The results suggest that the other’s opinions are used as anchors when making judgments and do not influence people’s perception as much as one may expect. The current work provides insights into cognitive mechanisms underlying collective behavior in online environments as well as a lesson for users and designers of social media websites.
منابع مشابه
Modelling Influence and Opinion Evolution in Online Collective Behaviour
Opinion evolution and judgment revision are mediated through social influence. Based on a large crowdsourced in vitro experiment (n = 861), it is shown how a consensus model can be used to predict opinion evolution in online collective behaviour. It is the first time the predictive power of a quantitative model of opinion dynamics is tested against a real dataset. Unlike previous research on th...
متن کاملOnline Judgment in the Context of International and National Rules: Ethical and Legal Challenges
Background: Online judgment is an economical and faster way than the judicial one. With the development of technology in recent decades, it has also been possible to make judgments online. Although few countries have incorporated this approach into their laws, online judgments are being developed and implemented in various areas such as international trade or intellectual property. The pres...
متن کاملThe Influence of Collective Opinion on True-False Judgment and Information-Sharing Decision
The purpose of the current work is to examine when and how knowing collective opinion influences people’s judgments and decisions in social media environments. In particular, the present work focuses on people’s true-false judgment of statements found on websites and the likelihood of sharing these statements. The results from Experiment 1 revealed that, for false statements, collective opinion...
متن کاملProbabilistic opinion pooling generalized Part two: Premise-based opinion pooling
We consider the classical problem of aggregating di¤erent individualsprobability assignments (opinions) over a -algebra of events. In practice, some events represent basic propositions, such as it rainsor CO2 emissions cause global warming, while others represent combinations thereof, for instance disjunctions (unions) of basic events. It is plausible to treat the basic events as premises ...
متن کاملThematic Progression in the Rhetorical Sections of an Online Iraqi English Newspaper
Abstract Thematic development refers to the way theme and rheme in the clause are developed. The theory of rhetorical structure can be defined as the strategies that follow specific ways to make writing more persuasive. The present study aimed to examine how Iraqi writers maintain cohesion in the text by analyzing the patterns of thematic progression in various rhetorical sections in an online ...
متن کامل